我要吃瓜

Article

Water conflicts: Exploring how stakeholder behaviours influence conflict (de-)escalation in practice

Details

Citation

Anderson HK, Quilliam RS & Price H (2025) Water conflicts: Exploring how stakeholder behaviours influence conflict (de-)escalation in practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 169, p. 104096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104096

Abstract
Social mobilisation to demand access to safe drinking water has led to increased water justice in many places across the world in recent years. Often, the impetus for change has relied on disempowered citizens taking action. In this study, we explored the experiences of residents (n = 22) in Aviemore (Scotland) who have been challenging the safety of their drinking water for over a decade. We also interviewed water company employees and drinking water regulator employees (n = 7) who were involved in the subsequent water quality investigations. Here we frame the events in Aviemore as a ‘water conflict’, which clarifies that movements for water justice involve multiple stakeholders all with capacity to act. We examined the relationship between behaviours adopted by different stakeholder groups and their consequences for conflict intensity (escalation/de-escalation). Using the Thomas-Kilmann conflict instrument to assign conflict behaviours to stakeholder actions, we found, as in other social movements for water justice, the progression and escalation of this conflict was mainly driven by the citizens taking some form of action. Furthermore, prolonged passive behaviours led to conflict escalation and conflict avoidance can lead to de-escalation, but not reconciliation. Here, we offer a new approach for evaluating water conflicts by assessing the relationship between stakeholder behaviours and conflict intensity. Using this approach, we propose that case-specific insights may be identified to support the prevention of, and intervention in, real-time conflict scenarios, as well as untangling the deeper structural and relational issues contributing to repeated conflict escalation to achieve constructive change.

Keywords
Decision making; SDG 6; Stakeholder behaviour; Water conflict; Water justice

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy: Volume 169

StatusPublished
Publication date31/07/2025
Date accepted by journal05/05/2025
URL
PublisherElsevier BV
ISSN1462-9011
ISBN1873-6416

People (3)

Mrs Heather Anderson

Mrs Heather Anderson

PhD Researcher, Biological and Environmental Sciences

Dr Heather Price

Dr Heather Price

Senior Lecturer, Biological and Environmental Sciences

Professor Richard Quilliam

Professor Richard Quilliam

Professor, Biological and Environmental Sciences

Files (1)